Hey @arcqus , ![]()
We’re reviewing this case together with your report here: BUG: Spell-checker language falls back to the one in the previous document. As soon as we have any updates, we’ll let you know in this thread.
Thanks for your patience!
Hey @arcqus , ![]()
We’re reviewing this case together with your report here: BUG: Spell-checker language falls back to the one in the previous document. As soon as we have any updates, we’ll let you know in this thread.
Thanks for your patience!